In the story below, I am troubled by two things:
- the assumption that a diversity of items being available proves that each of them are rarer to come by (here a yellow hat). How a Google search can help assessing this baffles me. Statistics of sale would be more relevant. Education of judges in how to use Google and how Google gathers its information?
- why indeed a judge can 'google' but not juries?
Judges Allowed To Use Google To 'Confirm Intuition' In Cases (TechDirt, 23 March 2010)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment